Skip to...

Main contents

Madison Covers Lil’ Wayne’s “Lollipop”

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

mov | wmv | 3gp | m4v

Lil’ Wayne’s Lollipop music video has been recreated by two young up and coming women artists, Madison and Erin. Madison’s a micro-celebrity on Myspace where you may listen and download her music for free.

Related posts: Kanye West and Perez Hilton.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • SphereIt
  • StumbleUpon

16 Comments to “Madison Covers Lil’ Wayne’s “Lollipop””

  1. sarah September 3rd, 2008 at 5:56 pm

  2. gal_n_the_city September 3rd, 2008 at 6:02 pm

    This young woman is very in touch with her sensuality and is not afraid to explore a song and make it pop!!! Great interpretation and very evolved!!!

    Good energy!!!

  3. caliguy September 3rd, 2008 at 6:05 pm

    nice story sarah and its a nice video by madison its sounds than the real version to me good job all :)

  4. sarah September 3rd, 2008 at 6:06 pm

    Hi guys, thank you! I love pop17 chats.

  5. Lawrence September 4th, 2008 at 12:59 am

    micro-celebretism doesn’t exists…
    there’s only famous, or not famous.

    and unless you’re tom cruise, oprah, paris, tiger…you can’t really call yourself any form of famous.

    and that’s that.

  6. Neil September 4th, 2008 at 2:00 am

    Did she seriously say she shot it on a Super 8 camera? WTF??

  7. FTW Bears September 4th, 2008 at 7:51 am

    they are good, but not great. I only slightly agree with Lawrence.

  8. sarah September 4th, 2008 at 11:11 am

    Lawrence, you can be mirco famous. There has always been micro fame and niche fame. It’s just that now with the internet there is a lot more of it. So maybe you just have a problem with the word celebrity. I also have a probelm with the word celebrity so I think we can agree with that.

    Can any one think of a better name for micro famous people? Famous for 15 GB of fame??

    What do we call them!!??

  9. Bhob September 4th, 2008 at 11:46 am

    How about “webcelebs”?

  10. Daryle Dickens September 4th, 2008 at 3:37 pm

    Since I have tuned into Pop17 I have thought a lot about fame and celebrity and I think Lawrence is wrong. There are levels of fame in all levels of community. Since I have been thinking about it I see it everywhere and could probably write a huge comment on it, but I’ll spare you that.

    Lawrence was hinted at in the video. Negative people who post anonymously. To me it makes them easy to ignore. There are plenty of us working to help each other and lift each other up that we don’t need to listen to the anonymous voices.

    Remember to be one of the good, because there are too many of the bad.

  11. sarah September 4th, 2008 at 5:59 pm

    Hi Daryle, I really appreciate your comment. I think there are people who are small in a big way online. Do you know what I mean? We can call them “celebrity” but at the same time that word is over used and has an old meaning. For example, I don’t call pop17 television, though some others do. I call it a web show. ITS A SHOW! But not TV? Yea I guess so.

    I think this is what Lawrence means.

  12. Lawrence September 4th, 2008 at 6:14 pm

    lol - Calling yourself a celebrity in a niche, is an oxymoron.

    Because celebrity - well, is a celebrity (not a semi-celeb)

    Atleast in the traditional sense.

    …holla, holla

  13. FTW Bears September 4th, 2008 at 7:20 pm

    it’s a total oxymoron LOL

  14. Lawrence September 5th, 2008 at 12:49 am

    @Daryle

    i’m not being negative - for the sake of being negative…just being objective/neutral - as i see it…

    now if the outcome is anything but positive, and you take it personal…that’s your problem

    grow thick skin

  15. dale boyce September 21st, 2008 at 5:31 pm

    cool sarah! I love it.

  16. Ozk September 29th, 2008 at 2:19 pm

    mystery??

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <img> <object> <embed> <param> <abbr> <a> <b> <blockquote> <del> <em> <i> <q> <strike> <strong>